ACAcuraAlfa RomeoAston MartinAudiBentleyBMWBugattiBuickCadillacCaterhamChevroletChryslerCitroenDaciaDaewooDaihatsuDodgeFerrariFiatFiskerFordGMCHondaHummerHyundaiInfinitiIsuzuJaguarJeepKiaKoenigseggLadaLamborghiniLanciaLand RoverLexusLincolnLotusMaseratiMaybachMazdaMcLarenMercedes-BenzMGMiniMitsubishiMorganNissanPaganiPeugeotPolestarPontiacPorscheRenaultRolls-RoyceRoverSaabScionSeatSkodaSmartSpykerSsangYongSubaruSuzukiTataTeslaToyotaTVRVauxhall VolkswagenVolvo
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser, 2000 - 2010
355Rating 2.825% worse than average rating of competitors (3.7)Review number: 5 34% worse than average rating of competitors (4.5)30% worse than average rating of competitors (4.5)11% better than average rating of competitors (3.2)9% better than average rating of competitors (2.9)23% worse than average rating of competitors (4.4)RecommendsYes 60% No 40%
The Chrysler PT Cruiser is a typical retro-style car made with hatchback (station wagon) and convertible bodies. The name PT has a dual meaning: it stands for Personal Transportation, and it stands for Platform Tall, the version of Platform Low used by Dodge Neon. PT Cruiser has many Neon components, but the design is reminiscent of the Chrysler Airflow models of the 1930s, which was supposed to appear under the Plymouth name, but the Daimler-Chrysler company at the time saw no prospects of developing the Plymouth brand and this was discontinued. was a success (one of the most successful in Chrysler history) and customers had to wait in line.It is a comfortable car with plenty of space for both passengers and luggage.But the car is not economical and maintenance costs for minor breakdowns are not gratifying.
| 2019-08-31 |
|
A Mexican miracle for the price of a bike :)
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Low market price, handsome retro style, high seat, good sounding audio equipment.
Rusting, rattling, uneconomical toy :)
|
Hi, the first time I have to write a negative review about a car. Well, this car is already like that. Nothing positive, apart from his charming retro look (at least for me) I can?t write. Oh, by the way, another comfortable, high...
Read full review
|
| 2018-09-30 |
|
2.0 petrol / gas in 2003
|
My rating
Recommended
|
appearance, plenty of space in the back, comfortable seats
like all 15 m.auto has a minus
|
I bought 4 years ago, unfortunately gas and everything is ok.10-11l.das 100km. 130km / h., Large turning radius, began to find autumn, but the car is already 15 years old. The chassis was maintained during the restoration of the t...
Read full review
|
| 2018-03-07 |
|
Better not buy. A nightmare on wheels.
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Traction enough, circuit, plenty of space in the cabin-spacious, distinctive design
Audio medium - narrow frequency range, solid suspension, hard to get details, super unreliable, hard to service
|
In two years of operation, the repairs are more than the market value of the machine. Of course, the machine was not new - in 2003. I bought in 2016?This first mystery was the jumping revs and the ever-popping check engine light w...
Read full review
|
| 2013-09-24 |
|
beautiful, reliable
|
My rating
Recommended
|
beautiful, spacious enough, reliable
the lady in the cabin might want it to be softer but not squeaky anyway.
|
beautiful, simple, reliable, inexpensive to repair....
Read full review
|
| 2009-08-26 |
|
2.4 110kW.
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Appearance
Expensive
|
The biggest plus is the appearance. I have been driving for more than half a year, so far there have been no major problems. Sitting behind the wheel, you can feel happy, so whoever is planning to buy, but afraid of operating cost...
Read full review
|
Chrysler PT Cruiser TOP competitors
|
|
|
|
Best rated hatchbacks
Best rated sedans
Best rated SUVs
Best rated coupes
Commercial vehicles
