ACAcuraAlfa RomeoAston MartinAudiBentleyBMWBugattiBuickCadillacCaterhamChevroletChryslerCitroenDaciaDaewooDaihatsuDodgeFerrariFiatFiskerFordGMCHondaHummerHyundaiInfinitiIsuzuJaguarJeepKiaKoenigseggLadaLamborghiniLanciaLand RoverLexusLincolnLotusMaseratiMaybachMazdaMcLarenMercedes-BenzMGMiniMitsubishiMorganNissanPaganiPeugeotPolestarPontiacPorscheRenaultRolls-RoyceRoverSaabScionSeatSkodaSmartSpykerSsangYongSubaruSuzukiTataTeslaToyotaTVRVauxhall VolkswagenVolvo
|
Mitsubishi Galant, 1997 - 2004
4518Rating 4.27% better than average rating of competitors (3.9)Review number: 18 3% better than average rating of competitors (3.9)9% better than average rating of competitors (4.0)4% better than average rating of competitors (4.0)5% better than average rating of competitors (3.9)10% better than average rating of competitors (4.1)RecommendsYes 100% No 0%
The eighth generation Galant continues the design traditions of the previous generation. The body of the station wagon was introduced, but the hatchback departed. The Mitsubishi Galant has been presented as an affordable alternative to BMW cars. The Japanese model has good dynamics, sharp handling and good independent suspension. This car has been very successful in Europe, especially with the introduction of advanced GDI diesel engines. Galant is praised for its driving and handling characteristics. The attractively designed car is a great choice for those who want to stand out from the crowd, although it is not as popular as some other Japanese sedans.
| 2014-08-20 |
|
Mitsubishi Galant 1997 2.0L 100kw Gasoline Gas
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Angry, fast, maneuverable, reliable
Rear arches
|
Very fun car, glad I bought it, spacious, manoeuvrable and nice to look at. The machine from Germany, in Lithuania only in 2006, has rust, but in order, it is not so scary when you put in the work and effort. The basis of the rear...
Read full review
|
| 2014-08-20 |
|
Galantas 1998m
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Nice, reliable, neither too soft nor too hard suspension, sporty, good power / economy ratio
Brown rear arches, poor sound insulation, details are not cheap, small rims spoil the look of the car, but that's not the point: D
|
I drive this shark 3 art, and so far I am very satisfied because the car is very manoeuvrable, if necessary, it suddenly moves out of place, it is a big plus at the traffic light, the suspension is quite soft and durable. I don't ...
Read full review
|
| 2012-11-02 |
|
Mitsubishi Galant 3.0 V6 GTZ
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Reliable in terms of speed, does not spoil too much
High turning angle, brown arches, solid suspension, plenty of fuel
|
Mitsubishi Galant 3.0 V6 GTZ - American version...
Read full review
|
| 2012-09-07 |
|
Mitsubishi Galant 2.5 Estate
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Good traction, powerful enough engine, sporty
Arches, Costs, Hard Suspension
|
With a galloping driver for about half a time (2.5 petrol). Before that I drove a Renault Safrane, it's a lot more fun to drive a safrane (although it drove, it was more often used in the service). First of all, the gallant is not...
Read full review
|
| 2010-09-18 |
|
About Galanta
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Appearance, sporty driving. nice salon
Sophisticated rear suspension, brown rear arches.
|
I am driving a 97 'Galanta with a 2.0l 100kw engine. It?s a really fun car. Before I had a Renault Laguna this difference between these cars is huge. Laguna was a bit softer, but she only wanted to go quietly from one point to ano...
Read full review
|
| 2010-06-27 |
|
Galant
|
My rating
Recommended
|
3.0i american brc gas, consumption zimetos gas. very soft and powerful auto, up to 140km / h in 10-13 seconds. I drove my whole life with a German production car. now I'm sorry I didn't buy Japanese before :))...
Read full review
|
| 2010-02-22 |
|
Mitsubishi Galant 97m.
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Beautiful, fast, good equipment, convenient.
Rust rear arches, expensive details.
|
I have been driving a shark-shark for 2 years. I would rate this car in a ten-point system - eight. A beautiful, uneconomical and quite fast car. Manual gearbox, sedan....
Read full review
|
| 2009-12-28 |
|
Not a bad car
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Have fun driving.
Rudyja arches
|
Since 2007 I have been driving with a 2000m 2.4GDI station wagon. Bikers all. I can't say much bad. I had to handle the rear shock absorbers. Price 1240lt unit. I restored both for 400lt. Cascade HYDRO PNEUMANT....
Read full review
|
| 2009-11-09 |
|
Mitsubishi Galant
|
My rating
Recommended
|
The biggest drawback for me is that the brown rear arches are very fast and yet any collision pebble will peel off the metallic layer from the front bumper and hood....
Read full review
|
| 2009-09-21 |
|
Good car
|
My rating
Recommended
|
a good, reliable car
rear arches
|
I bought myself before 1.5 at 2ltr 100kw station wagon, tech. inspection for the first time passed. i'm very happy with it just like everyone dew with possible arches it's nothing and so everything is ok....
Read full review
|
| 2009-05-30 |
|
Good car
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Comfort, exclusive design, durability, affordable detail prices
In autumn, the rear arches
|
My car is 99m. 2l. (100kw) general, I bought a car to hit but it was only 88 thousand when I drove. and it felt like the car was like new. After buying the technical I did not pass just because of one faro light over the woven, 10...
Read full review
|
| 2009-05-09 |
|
Not a bad car
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Good, durable, well managed, spacious
Pune rear arches have a problem with the belts
|
I have a 98m 2 liter 100kw sedan.first of all about the cabin. exterior worth demiosio exclusive design, aggressive looks front, but there is also a problem.ruddy rear arch buna does not close the hood.galantle control is really g...
Read full review
|
| Raimundas 2009-03-20 |
|
In my opinion about this car
|
My rating
Recommended
|
Pros - comfort and "shark" design
I didn't really feel it.
|
I bought a Mitsubishi Galant a year ago in 1997. I paid about 12700lt. As at this time, the machine may be very big, but comparing the quality and price ratio, I think it's quite normal....
Read full review
|
| valdelis 2009-02-09 |
|
Not a bad, affordable mid-range car
|
My rating
Recommended
|
A practical, capacious car with medium performance. A reasonable price. Quite an interesting design.
Maybe a bit boring interior, weak suspension. Very average car.
|
Vase with 1999 2-liter sedan. This is a good choice as the car costs relatively little. For that, you get quite a car, which is more spacious than the Audi a4, almost like the A6 model. Galant looks interesting, distinctive, sport...
Read full review
|
| 2007-12-21 |
|
galant 2 .0 16v
|
My rating
Recommended
|
134 horses-small, swallow 13 gas (in the city), soft, stable, quickly warms up the cabin in winter, but the rear windows dew, with more frost outside-and everyone else tries, poorly insulated from outside sound, front bumper parki...
Read full review
|
| 2007-06-25 |
|
Mitsubishi Galant Sport
|
My rating
Recommended
|
I only have a car for 5 months. Rides great, powerful and quite economical. Before that I had a Galant 2.0i 16v in 1997. and I made sure the Japanese cars were really quality....
Read full review
|
| 2007-02-26 |
|
galant
|
My rating
Recommended
|
great machine, good traction, normal benzo intake, etc....
Read full review
|
Mitsubishi Galant TOP competitors
|
|
|
|
Best rated hatchbacks
Best rated sedans
Best rated SUVs
Best rated coupes
Commercial vehicles
