Autoasas
Overview

CAR SEARCH

SEARCH BY TEMPER

TOP 100
Find the fastest, most powerful or heaviest cars!

ACAcuraAlfa RomeoAston MartinAudiBentleyBMWBugattiBuickCadillacCaterhamChevroletChryslerCitroenCupraDaciaDaewooDaihatsuDodgeFerrariFiatFiskerFordGMCHondaHummerHyundaiInfinitiIsuzuJaguarJeepKiaKoenigseggLadaLamborghiniLanciaLand RoverLexusLincolnLotusMaseratiMaybachMazdaMcLarenMercedes-BenzMGMiniMitsubishiMorganNissanPaganiPeugeotPolestarPontiacPorscheRenaultRolls-RoyceRoverSaabScionSeatSkodaSmartSpykerSsangYongSubaruSuzukiTataTeslaToyotaTVRVauxhall VolkswagenVolvo
1306 from 1900
Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007
Nissan X-Trail, 2001 - 2007
514RatingAverage car rating4.05% better than average rating of competitors (3.7)Review number: 14
RecommendsYes 7% No 93%
Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007Nissan X-Trail 2001 - 2007
The Nissan X-Trail is Nissan's first SUV crossover. The car uses the Nissan FF-S platform and appeared at a time when a number of companies were introducing their SUVs - Ford Escape, Mazda Tribute, Hyundai Santa Fe and Pontiac Aztek. Various Nissan SUVs are produced in different markets, respectively the X-Trail is marketed below the Xterra, Nissan Pathfinder or Nissan Murano, but above the Qashqai model. In North America, the X-Trail model will be replaced by the Nissan Rogue, which uses the same platform as the X-Trail. The Nissan Rogue model will have a very similar design to the Qashqai popular in Europe. The X-Trail SUV has become very popular in many countries due to its practical size, comfortable ride, good passability and low cost. In 2008, the Nissan X-Trail was upgraded to a slightly larger SUV (now 4,630 mm long) and built on the new Nissan / Renault Alliance C platform. However, this updated model is not planned to be sold in North American markets.
Written by: Ashton | 2015-02-03
NISSAN X-TRAIL ’04 2.0 + LPG
My rating My rating Recommended
Reliability My car reliability rating Performance My rating of the car engine and performance Build quality My rating for the build quality of the car Comfort My rating of the vehicle comfort Steering My rating for stability, driving control and car feeling on the road
Capacity, reliability, comfort, cross-country ability
Old-fashionable interior, diesel engines, fabric seats
Year: 2004
Engine capacity, l: 2,0
Fuel Type: Petrol
Gearbox: Mechanical
Body type: SUV
Car description
Let’s begin with a summary: it’s a good vehicle and enough comfortable for long-distance trips down the highway. Good sound isolation also makes it more attractive. On sharp corners it swings out slightly. Sitting in the back of the car will provide you with comfort, whilst if needed the third row folds forward to increase luggage space (couple of times I laid a 120cm length inflatable mattress; it was no prob for me to lie down at full-length in the trunk either :). Capability of driving on and off the road can be well-rated too. The interior design is so-so, no premium materials are found there unfortunately. Fabric seats get dirty quickly, stains are very visible. Car panel design has been significantly improved since 2004 so I’d never recommend you any older models. The exterior design (personally for me) is quite stylish making this vehicle more exceptional than the rest of the modern-day competitors. However serious image is spoiled due to plastic front wings. Equipment that I’ve got is rather simple thus I can’t make any comments about leather interior, navigation system, a sunroof with a see through skylight or additional lights mounted on the top of my car.
Performance
When I was searching for reviews as regards this vehicle, I’ve noticed that most owners complain about diesel engine faults that occur due to problems related to fuel/air supply or mechanical components. So I’ve chosen a petrol engine. In general, the choice of engines is limited, the one my vehicle has is a 2.0 L engine 104 kW, 192 Nm. Once it’s off the road it lacks of power, then a “4DW lock” button is selected. Sometimes I like to dream of a more powerful 2.5 L engine … According to my calculation, only 1 L of engine oil was used after running 6.000 miles (compression is good, no leakage). Since I don’t drive in the city, my fuel consumption on the highway – approx. 25 mpg. Another good thing about the capacity – I managed to place a 45 kg gas bottle instead of a spare wheel.
Reliability, running costs
Depreciation is minimal. After the car has done 20.000 miles I had to change only a tie rod end.
Recommendations to buyers
First, evaluate whether you need or not an SUV or MPV. If both – that’s the right option. Yet, if you drive more often in the city, I’d recommend looking for a city car, but if you live out of town – it will be a good choice.
Rate this review (Total 1)
Nissan car timeline
Type 1990 s2000 s2010 s2020 s
567890123456789012345678901234
  Mini   Pixo  
  Subcompact MicraMicraMicraMicra 
   NoteNote
  Compact Sunny    
AlmeraAlmeraTiidaPulsar  
  SentraSentraSentra
  LeafLeaf
  Mid-size PrimeraPrimera   
  AltimaAltimaAltimaAltima
  Large  MaximaMaximaMaximaMaxima 
  Coupe 100 NX    
200 SX200 SX   
  Mini crossover   JukeJuke
  Crossover   X-TrailX-TrailX-TrailX-Trail
  QashqaiQashqaiQashqai
    Ariya
  Mid-size SUV Terrano   
 PathfinderPathfinderPathfinderPathfinder
  MuranoMuranoMurano
  Large SUV  PatrolPatrol
  Pickup   NavaraNavara
  Mini MPV  Almera Tino   
  CubeCube  
  Note  
  MPV   Quest Quest  
  Sports car 300 ZX  350Z370Z 
SkylineSkyline   
    Z
  Supercar   GT-R
  Leisure activity vehicle     Townstar
  Van   NV200
  567890123456789012345678901234
1990 s2000 s2010 s2020 s
VIDEO