ACAcuraAlfa RomeoAston MartinAudiBentleyBMWBugattiBuickCadillacCaterhamChevroletChryslerCitroenCupraDaciaDaewooDaihatsuDodgeFerrariFiatFiskerFordGMCHondaHummerHyundaiInfinitiIsuzuJaguarJeepKiaKoenigseggLadaLamborghiniLanciaLand RoverLexusLincolnLotusMaseratiMaybachMazdaMcLarenMercedes-BenzMGMiniMitsubishiMorganNissanPaganiPeugeotPolestarPontiacPorscheRenaultRolls-RoyceRoverSaabScionSeatSkodaSmartSpykerSsangYongSubaruSuzukiTataTeslaToyotaTVRVauxhall VolkswagenVolvo
|
Ford Transit, 2013 - present
The new Ford Transit has become as close to the passenger car together as ever more practical. This is a crucial model for a company whose coger importance is even greater than the soon-to-be-released Mondeo and Fiesta models. The design of the car is certainly not essential, much more important is the comfort of the cab. Behind the wheel, the driver can easily feel like sitting behind the wheel of a Ford Focus - beautiful design, logical device layout, poor material quality, perfectly balanced steering, and the cab is quiet. Only a few things can be mentioned as a disadvantage - it is a poor overview of the struts and how awkward the position of the pedals. The maximum space in the luggage compartment is 5,520 liters, which is 330 liters more than in the old SWB Transit. Transit engines are the latest 2.2 displacement TDCi diesel units with 100, 125 and 155 hp. The fuel consumption of cars with these engines is one of the lowest in the class ~ 6.5 l / 100 km and CO2 emissions of 178g / km. Thus, Transit is setting new standards in the commercial car class, but at the same time, it makes the car more expensive than many competitors.
|
|
Petrol: 3.6 LDiesel: 2 - 3 LElectricity: n/d L
|
|
|
Petrol: 3.6 LDiesel: 2 - 3 LElectricity: n/d L
|
|
|
Diesel: 2.5 L
|
|
|
Diesel: 2.1 - 3 LElectricity: n/d L
|
|
|
Diesel: 2.3 L
|
|
|
Diesel: 2.3 L
|
|
|
Diesel: 2.5 LElectricity: n/d L
|
|
Compare
Ford Transit TOP competitors
|
|
|