ACAcuraAlfa RomeoAston MartinAudiBentleyBMWBugattiBuickCadillacCaterhamChevroletChryslerCitroenCupraDaciaDaewooDaihatsuDodgeFerrariFiatFiskerFordGMCHondaHummerHyundaiInfinitiIsuzuJaguarJeepKiaKoenigseggLadaLamborghiniLanciaLand RoverLexusLincolnLotusMaseratiMaybachMazdaMcLarenMercedes-BenzMGMiniMitsubishiMorganNissanPaganiPeugeotPolestarPontiacPorscheRenaultRolls-RoyceRoverSaabScionSeatSkodaSmartSpykerSsangYongSubaruSuzukiTataTeslaToyotaTVRVauxhall VolkswagenVolvo
|
Volvo XC90, 2003 - 2014
4520Rating 4.20% worse than average rating of competitors (4.2)Review number: 20 11% worse than average rating of competitors (4.5)11% worse than average rating of competitors (4.5)0% worse than average rating of competitors (4.0)0% worse than average rating of competitors (4.0)0% worse than average rating of competitors (4.0)RecommendsYes 5% No 95%
| Jimmy 2014-11-23 |
|
Good, expensive maintenance if breaks down
|
My rating
Recommended
|
This vehicle is comfortable enough, quite dynamic bearing in mind its weight, but what’s mostly worth paying attention to is it doesn’t break down as frequently as my previous cars like WV Passat, Golf, Audi A6 and especially MB E200, easily overcomes mos
Major disadvantages are: consumes too much fuel, not enough compartments, quite expensive tires, since you own Volvo expect to pay extra more in auto repair shops, sensitive gas regulation, front leather seats and hand brake wear out very quickly
|
I bought it half a year ago and to my mind it is quite stable, ‘patient’, having a good look, powerful and comfortable enough. If you decide to buy a gasoline-powered car (without gas), have in mind that fuel consumption will be h...
Read full review
|
Volvo XC90 TOP competitors
|
|
|
|
Best rated hatchbacks
Best rated sedans
Best rated SUVs
Best rated coupes
Commercial vehicles
